«

»

Feb
08

Arturo Fuente Hemingway Classic Natural Cigar Review

cigar reviews review http:///cigarobsession.com Arturo Fuente Hemingway Classic Natural This 7×48 stick offered a small open foot, that I would suggest cutting off before lighting, having tried it closed. The first 3rd of this cigar was the most mild experience I have had of any cigar, hands down. Barely any smoke or body, and the flavors were just a touch of sweet wood and a short clean finish. Pretty much like sucking warm air. The half way point finally woke it up, producing a normal amount of smoke, bringing the body and strength up to a medium point, adding flavors of caramel, nuts, creamy wood and leather at points, with a small spice kick on the finish. The last third brought a longer finish and higher strength, actually giving me a little buzz, although the body did not follow. The flavors near the end went to just a smooth nut and toasty taste with a parched finish. Photography by BG Pictures.
Video Rating: 4 / 5

16 comments

No ping yet

  1. BikerBry says:

    Not impressed with the Hemingways. Flavor profile wise? I found them un-complex. Well constructed but still not great. I’d take an 858 over any of the Hemingway Cigars.

  2. robotsongs says:

    Bryan, have you smoked more than just this one? If you haven’t, I really think you should as you seem to? have got a bum stick. I’ve got a box of these and they’re really some of my favorites, I definitely detected different flavors than what you were noting (particularly a good amount of cinnamon), and I just wonder if there’s another one in your future….

  3. cigarobsession says:

    @6389033 It depends greatly? upon where you are

  4. 6389033 says:

    wats the price for a box of? thos?

  5. SnuggleBear1970 says:

    I love the Hemingway series but I can rarely afford? them.

  6. cigarobsession says:

    Thanks for watching! AND PUT DOWN THAT B&M CRAP! lol?

  7. DumpFantasy says:

    I like your videos. Im trying to figure out what cigars i will want to smoke in the future because? right now im only smoking black and milds so your cideos help. And i also liked your humidor video it was informative

  8. Demicron says:

    One of the first cigars that I have tried! It is fantastic? smoke! Quite different from smoking Hookah tobacco.

  9. bryceman11111 says:

    I really like your revew style. I watch a decent amout of reviews and I think your format and opinion is my favorite. Keep up the good work.?

  10. Jorgie0101 says:

    I’m new to cigar smoking… why do? people mention the ash holding on & why do they try to keep it on instead of ashing it like a cigarette?

  11. cigarobsession says:

    It depends on my mood, I don’t have just one. See the post on my site for my current fav? list.

  12. qwertykeybordd says:

    what? is you favorite cigar of all time?

  13. landfillpoet says:

    Thanks for the review. I just bought one on a recommendation and have been nosing around looking for a review? so I could figure out a nice pairing. Judging from what you said, I think Templeton Rye whiskey would work. Thanks and subbed.

  14. cigarobsession says:

    I don’t block comments. I turned off rating? because some assclown went around and was rating everything 1 star.

  15. amberpoovey says:

    Im just wondering why you block comments and ratings on a lot of your videos…isn’t the discussion/ratings that follows? like the best part of posting videos?

  16. victory01 says:

    haven’t tried the classic but i’m thinking the short story is just as you explained it. a classic cut in half. its a very short smoke but the? flavor is so enjoyable you wish it would last for hours. i’m glad a saw this review before picking up a bigger hemingway thinking it would deliver a the same experience as the short story but longer. thanks! ill stick with the short storys, hehe.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>